Stripe Client Provisioning for a Media Production Studio
A Make.com pipeline turns a Stripe webhook into provisioned Drive, CRM, Finance, brief, and notification resources without manual setup.
Read the projectConnect the requests, approvals and updates your team handles by hand. Start with one repeatable workflow, with clear ownership when something needs attention.
Organizations we’ve worked with
Every one of these is a handoff a system should own. Today, people are the glue.
All six are one problem: people acting as the glue between tools that were never connected. Remove that one job, and the rest of the list starts disappearing with it.
Follow one request down the line. It is classified on arrival, then every system it touches is updated in sequence and confirmed — no one copies data between tools, and nothing waits in an inbox.
Not everything should be automatic. When confidence is low or a rule has no answer, the run pauses into a review queue with full context — a person decides, and the workflow resumes. Judgment stays human; the chasing does not.
A purchase request includes its owner, amount and supporting information.
An amount above the agreed limit pauses the workflow and notifies the approver.
The recorded decision resumes the approved action; failed updates enter a retry or review queue.
A recorded decision creates an audit trail. Rules only change through an agreed review; the workflow does not automatically learn new policy.
A published example of related work. Your systems, scope and acceptance checks are agreed separately.
A Make.com pipeline turns a Stripe webhook into provisioned Drive, CRM, Finance, brief, and notification resources without manual setup.
Read the projectPick the one that hurts most — today on the left, as a production system on the right. A representative pattern; your map will be exact.
Days to first response · 5 manual touches
Minutes to first response · 0 manual handoffs
No rip-and-replace — the system wires into your stack.+ any tool with an API
Operations Automation is built from three engineering capabilities working together.
Trigger, routing, approval, and execution logic that moves work end-to-end without chasing.
Classification, prioritization, and next-action selection for the decisions that stay manual today.
The connective layer that lets CRM, ERP, and internal tools share state instead of humans.
Slide to your reality. This is only arithmetic — the review tells you which of those hours a system can actually own.
30hrs / week
≈ 1,380 hours a year spent moving data, chasing approvals, and stitching reports instead of work that needs judgment.
Planning estimate based on the inputs above, not a forecast of savings.
Assumes a 40-hour week and ~46 working weeks a year. We will tell you which of those hours a system can own — and which it should not.
Four steps, and each one hands you a concrete artifact — not a status update.
We trace how work actually moves today — who touches it, where it stalls, and which handoffs are manual.
You get
A map of how work really moves
Done when
The worst workflow is chosen and its constraint named
We define trigger logic, routing rules, integrations, and the AI decisions that remove coordination.
You get
The system design — triggers, routes, integrations
Done when
Every handoff has an owner — human or system
We build the automation and wire it into your CRM, ERP, and internal tools with production safeguards.
You get
A running automation in your stack
Done when
The first real request flows end-to-end
We add agreed verification steps and monitoring so failed actions can be investigated and recovered.
You get
Monitoring with every action confirmed
Done when
Agreed workflow, alert and recovery checks pass
We would rather map the wrong workflow out than sell you a system you do not need.
Not sure which side you are on? Most teams aren’t — until the workflow is mapped.
Same governed handoffs — applied where construction, education, hospitality, retail, and logistics teams are currently the glue.
Pick a recurring task with a clear trigger and a measurable finish. We map the handoffs before deciding what to automate.
Walk us through one recent request, the tools involved and where someone had to step in.
An example helps; a finished specification is not required.
We agree the scope, delivery approach and price before implementation. Where discovery is needed, its scope and fee are agreed first.
Routine work follows agreed rules. Exceptions go to a named person with enough context to act.
Scope, delivery and what happens next. The details that help you decide.
Turn a defined workflow into an agreed automation scope. Review the package, deliverables and eligibility before choosing your next step.
Explore Automation SprintAsk about your projectYes. Start with a recurring task that has a clear trigger and finish. We agree the tools, approvals, exceptions and completion checks before proposing a wider rollout.
The scope defines retries, alerts and an exception owner. We test the agreed failure cases and make unresolved work visible rather than treating a successful execution log as proof of a completed business action.
Not necessarily. We review existing connectors and APIs first. Access restrictions, licensing and API limits may affect the implementation and are checked during scoping.
We review the intended outcome, existing systems and dependencies, then agree deliverables, acceptance checks, responsibilities and price. If discovery is needed first, its scope and fee are agreed separately before that work begins.
The delivery plan depends on scope, access, integrations and review dependencies. We agree milestones after that assessment rather than promise the same timeline for every system.
Bring an example of the workflow or user journey and an overview of the systems involved. We agree the access needed for the work. Do not send passwords or private customer data through the enquiry form.
Handover, documentation, defect coverage and any ongoing support follow the chosen offer and written scope. New features, additional integrations and continuing maintenance are not assumed to be included.
We will map one manual workflow, find the real constraint, and show you the first operational system to build.
20–30 minutes · No preparation needed · Prefer to read first? How to stop being the glue between CRM and spreadsheets · Send a note instead