CRM/ERP integration

Keep your CRM and ERP working from the same facts.

Connect customer, order and operational records without making your team re-enter them. Define which system owns each field and how failed updates recover.

  • 20–30 minute review
  • No preparation needed
  • One sync mapped
Start with a defined scope. Explore the relevant package.Automation Sprint

Organizations we’ve worked with

  • Airbnb
  • TheAMLab
  • Hood
  • NAMA
  • Klaro
  • GoBoon
  • Studio Arlington
What disconnected systems cost you

The work of keeping systems aligned

Every one of these exists because the integration lives in people, not in a system.

The diagnosis

All six are one problem: people are the API between your systems of record. Replace that job with a real integration layer, and the rest of the list starts disappearing with it.

  1. 01Disconnected systems of recordCRM, ERP, and accounting each hold their own version of the customer — and none of them agree.
  2. 02Duplicate data entryThe same account, order, or invoice keyed into two or three systems by hand.
  3. 03Spreadsheet reconciliationMonth-end spent exporting and matching rows to figure out which system is right.
  4. 04Records that driftPrices, statuses, and customer details slip out of sync and quietly cause downstream errors.
  5. 05Fragile point-to-point scriptsOne-off connections that break silently and no one owns until something downstream fails.
  6. 06Handoffs that wait on re-keyingOrders and invoices queue behind whoever’s turn it is to copy them across.
One source of truth

Records that stay in sync

Account, order, and invoice records flow both ways through a reliable integration layer. Each record has a defined source of truth, so CRM and ERP agree without anyone re-keying data or reconciling spreadsheets at month-end. Here is what that looked like in production.

System Integration
99.7% inventory accuracy

Store, warehouse, and supplier systems synchronized into one connected inventory platform across 127 locations — every record with a defined source of truth.

System Integration
45% fewer stock-outs

With every system agreeing in real time, replenishment ran on live data instead of morning exports — $890K recovered in the first year.

ILLUSTRATIVE WALKTHROUGH

Agree record ownership before connecting systems

  1. 01

    Customer · CRM owns contact details

    Validated contact updates flow to the ERP without overwriting ERP-owned finance fields.

  2. 02

    Order · ERP owns fulfilment

    Order status flows back to the CRM so customer-facing teams can see progress.

  3. 03

    Conflict · review queue

    Duplicate identifiers or rejected updates keep their source data and go to an assigned owner.

The scope defines field mappings, update frequency, API limits, retries and reconciliation checks.

PUBLISHED PROJECT

See the work
behind the approach.

A published example of related work. Your systems, scope and acceptance checks are agreed separately.

RELATED DELIVERY

GoHighLevel + Shopify Operations Automation

Rebuilt Shopify-to-GoHighLevel opportunity sync on n8n with error handling after diagnosing pipeline, tag sync, and email failures.

Read the project
Pick your record

See the re-keying disappear

Pick the record that hurts most — today on the left, through the integration layer on the right. A representative pattern; your field mapping will be exact.

Today — people bridge it
  • 1Deal closes, account created in the CRMonly in CRM
  • 2Details emailed to finance for ERP setupinbox limbo
  • 3Finance re-keys the account by handre-keyed
  • 4A billing detail slips in wrongsilent error
  • 5Two systems now disagree about the customerdrift begins

Days to billable · keyed twice, drifting from day one

With the integration layer
  • Account created once, in the CRMsource of truth
  • Record propagates to the ERP instantlyauto
  • Fields validated against the mappingverified
  • Both systems agree from day onein sync

Minutes to billable · keyed once, verified

Works with the systems you already run

No rip-and-replace — the layer wires into your stack.+ any tool with an API

  • HubSpot
  • Salesforce
  • Odoo
  • SAP
  • NetSuite
  • Dynamics 365
  • Zoho
  • Shopify
  • QuickBooks
  • Xero
  • Stripe
Do the math

How much human integration are you running on?

Slide to your reality. This is only arithmetic — the review tells you which of those records a real integration layer should move.

10500
115
Re-keying overhead

10hrs/week

≈ 460 hours a year of people acting as the API — re-keying, checking, and reconciling records a system should move.

Open the full ROI calculator

Planning estimate based on the inputs above, not a forecast of savings.

Assumes ~46 working weeks a year. We will tell you which of those records a layer should move — and which it should not.

How we deliver

From manual reconciliation to synchronized systems

Four steps, and each one hands you a concrete artifact — not a status update.

  1. 01 · Discover

    Map the records

    We trace how accounts, orders, and invoices actually move between CRM, ERP, and accounting — and where people fill the gaps by hand.

    You get

    A field-mapping doc of how records really flow

    Done when

    The sync that costs the most reconciliation is chosen

  2. 02 · Design

    Design the sync

    We define the source of truth per record, transformation rules, and how conflicts get resolved — explicitly, on paper.

    You get

    A data ownership matrix — who owns which field

    Done when

    Every field has one owner and one direction of flow

  3. 03 · Build

    Build the layer

    We build a real integration layer with reliable APIs, retries, and safeguards — not fragile point-to-point scripts.

    You get

    The first record syncing end-to-end in production

    Done when

    A record entered once appears correctly everywhere

  4. 04 · Operate

    Operate and verify

    We ship with monitoring and reconciliation checks so drift is caught the moment it starts, not at month-end.

    You get

    Monitoring with reconciliation checks on every sync

    Done when

    Agreed mapping, retry and reconciliation checks pass

Is this the right starting point?

Where a CRM/ERP Integration Layer fits

We would rather map the wrong sync out than sell you an integration you do not need.

Good fit when

Start here
  • People re-key the same records between CRM, ERP, and finance
  • Data conflicts across systems and no one is sure which is right
  • Month-end is lost to spreadsheet reconciliation
  • You have clear systems of record, they just do not stay in sync

Not a fit when

Not yet
  • A single native connector already keeps the two systems in sync
  • The systems have no APIs or exports to integrate against at all
  • The real need is a new product to build, not systems to connect
  • Records are entered once and never need to flow between systems

Not sure which side you are on? Most teams aren’t — until the workflow is mapped.

Spreadsheet handoffs → production sync

When Sheets became the integration layer between CRM and ERP, the fix is governed handoffs — not more manual reconciliation. Architecture owns the design; this page owns the first production sync.

YOUR FIRST ENGAGEMENT

Start with one record that crosses systems.

Choose a customer, order or invoice flow. Map the source of truth and the business action that depends on an accurate update.

Start with a conversation

Show us the two systems, sample fields and a recent duplicate, missing or conflicting record.

An example helps; a finished specification is not required.

BEFORE IMPLEMENTATION

Know what you are agreeing to.

  • Field ownership and mapping rules
  • Duplicate, conflict and retry behaviour
  • A scoped integration with end-to-end verification

We agree the scope, delivery approach and price before implementation. Where discovery is needed, its scope and fee are agreed first.

A connection is only part of the job. Access, API limits and recovery rules are reviewed before implementation.

Need people to work in a shared interface too?
BEFORE YOU GET STARTED

CRM/ERP Integration questions

Scope, delivery and what happens next. The details that help you decide.

A RELEVANT WAY TO WORK WITH US

Automation Sprint

Turn a defined workflow into an agreed automation scope. Review the package, deliverables and eligibility before choosing your next step.

Explore Automation SprintAsk about your project
Which system becomes the source of truth?

Ownership is agreed by record and field. For example, the CRM may own contact details while the ERP owns fulfilment status. We document which updates may overwrite which fields.

How do you handle conflicting or failed updates?

We agree matching, conflict, retry and reconciliation rules. Unresolved updates retain enough context for investigation and go to an assigned owner instead of silently overwriting data.

Will the integration run in real time?

That depends on the APIs, event support, rate limits and business need. We agree an update frequency and recovery approach after reviewing those constraints; real-time sync is not assumed.

What happens before implementation starts?

We review the intended outcome, existing systems and dependencies, then agree deliverables, acceptance checks, responsibilities and price. If discovery is needed first, its scope and fee are agreed separately before that work begins.

How long will the work take?

The delivery plan depends on scope, access, integrations and review dependencies. We agree milestones after that assessment rather than promise the same timeline for every system.

What access or preparation do you need?

Bring an example of the workflow or user journey and an overview of the systems involved. We agree the access needed for the work. Do not send passwords or private customer data through the enquiry form.

What happens after handover?

Handover, documentation, defect coverage and any ongoing support follow the chosen offer and written scope. New features, additional integrations and continuing maintenance are not assumed to be included.

Start here

Stop being the integration layer

We will map how records move between your CRM and ERP, find the sync that costs you the most, and show you the first integration to build.

20–30 minutes · No preparation needed · Prefer to read first? How to stop being the glue between CRM and spreadsheets · Send a note instead

Work with Octacer

Get your next project moving.

Add engineers, automate a process, fix a broken system or launch a product. We’ll help you choose a clear next step.

Clear scope. Work in your accounts.

Discuss your project

Opens a short enquiry form